Thursday, March 29, 2007

Is Julie helping me prove my case?

It would certainly seem so as I offer the following: (Julie's comments in italics)

First Julie says (there was some mix up and I believe she meant to aim this at ACLAF and FS):

I was shocked at the anti when I started to get involved but I understand where they come from. Have you any idea how much these feminists want men dead? How they want to eradicate men completely from existence? Are you aware there was a gender war back in the 80's? And no women stood by the men? (Maybe a few but not enough) Are you aware that some of these men were raped from these feminists because of their stand and are you aware how these feminists rape? Worse than men. They may have killed some men, I don't know but I wouldn't put it past them. They will do anything to KILL you because you are X. You are a deformed Y to them.
https://www2.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5848431105100092513&postID=4246004659373716096


Yes,I agree that feminism is out to get men.

Then the contridictions starts:

Are you aware of the amount of women who walk out one door while their husbands walk out the other door when their plane hits land outside of the Eastern countries. You can't tell me that these women prefer to be hidden behind cloth and holding their men as their God like creatures.


I told her that women world wide fare better than men world wide do.

Other countries also have it but in different ways. Thailand women cause problems for men (just ask your embassy)because men cannot own homes if they are not from that country. They may own 49% while their new wife (who is supposed to be better than western women LOL) owns 51%. Then as the niave man's back is turned, she sells the house and is gone.
These women are trained and have been for centuries to get the better of men.


I pointed out how I would like to exterminate feminists.

To which:

I liked your comment till you said you hate feminists.
I must be a feminist as the mothers who started this were. They really mean't well. Honest. They are upset now that things have become what they are. They were the good women and so are the real victims.
https://www2.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=5848431105100092513&postID=9112971477355213832


She also said I should back off feminists. Well,Julie that is not going to happen.

Ah,the mask of the female anti-feminist starts to rip and we find out she is not so "anti" anymore. Feminism is an misandric system out to exterminate men and only 3 people have whitewashed it so far: ACLAF,FS and now Julie.

Wednesday, March 28, 2007

Junior,again...this time on Marc Lepine-again

It seems that junior is insinuating that Lepine and I are feminist puppets. Junior truly is too funny. There is a lot supposition in his data and the downplaying of feminism as though he is excusing feminism. Aren't these the actions of a feminist? Yes it is.

Davout called into question ACLAF's data.

Davout said: (ACLAF's comment in "")

"any female applicant with a comparable record would no doubt have been made the same offer"

There is considerable evidence to the contrary, especially in Martin Loney's book. I don't condone Lepine's actions but affirmative action ensures that women with lower grades than men get into university. It would be interesting to get a hold of the selections data, for say 1969-1989, for engineering universities in Quebec and see how many women got in because of reverse discrimination. The number of women getting in unfairly=the number of men who didn't make it.Lepine could have actually been a help rather than a hindrance, if he bothered to publicise, in some manner, the biased selections process.

March 26, 2007 11:33 AM

Yes,but as I've pointed out this happened in the pre-civilian use of the internet and publisizing it would be very expensive and difficult to do since feminists controlled the old media.

It seems to be like I said,Mr. Lepine's back was to the wall.

Source: https://www2.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7332840840063644174&postID=6299697475156286148&isPopup=true

McMoron....again

It seems that McMoron (FS) is at it again on his blog's responses section and this time he is getting his ass kicked by Old Guard and Old Guard is the wiser of the two. No,I'm not Old Guard either.

McMoron spouts off:

Feminist scum said:

These old guys hate me because I dared to question some guy who made an attack on female anti feminists. If I made an attack on someone who made an attack on a male anti feminist, I wouldn't have these old guys coming on to my blog harassing me. I think it's pretty pathetic really.

17 March 2007 11:41

Old Guard said:

You appear to be a very immature newcomer, and if you'd stop trying to please women the way that you do, perhaps people would stop thinking you are pussy whipped. You seem more prejudiced against old timers, (your words) than against the enemy; western women. Stop kissing up to women you wimp.

17 March 2007 15:45

Feminist scum said:

Stop crying, little man. I'm not changing my ways for any one. If you don't like it, tough shit. When it comes to female anti feminists, and females who want to better their selves, I'll always support them. I support men who are getting screwed over just as much, if not more.You can carry on replying to this thread if you want, but as far as I'm concerned I'm done with you.

17 March 2007 15:52

Old Guard said:

...But I don't respect FS or ACLAF and I am in agreement with masculist man on this one. And ACLAFS stupid wife who bitches just like these two manginas. They are pretending to be mras when they are nothing but yellow bellies who are obsessed with making themselves sound appealing to women. Sell outs is what they are fast becoming.

19 March 2007 12:33

Of course Junior has to pipe in with:

ACLAF said:

This is all too convenient to be coincidence. I believe that I'm the one who first used the term "old guard" in the context of speaking about an older generation of MRA's. I can't help but notice that the term has been co-opted. This is not however to original definition of what it means to be the "old guard." Perhaps "old guard" you could enlighten us about the original definition of the phrase. Somehow, I doubt that you'll have any idea what the phrase actually refers to.

19 March 2007 18:38

Then of course ACLAF has to have his banshee weigh in with:

AFN said:

oh yeah old guard? are you CERTAIN that you are your OWN entity?To me you sound more like an imaginary friend ...................and by the way, you obviously do not understand the meaning of "old guard".

20 March 2007 05:10

Old Guard stands up to these morons with:

Old Guard said:

Just like the coward you are FS, getting others to stand up for you. And you lose 100 respect points for hiding behind Fred as you've done in the past.And ACLAF, Old Guard is my name, I don't need to define my own name now surely. You and your wife need to get in the stables you ugly beasts.

20 March 2007 09:59

Notice how ACLAF and FS receive a lot of FEMALE praise.

Hmm,it seems that there are 3 of us that have caught on to these two. Are there anymore?

Source: https://www2.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=2269605924804131202&postID=7167294176982781792&isPopup=true

Sunday, March 25, 2007

Moron has his thumb up his ass

This from FS's blog,over the link to this site:

Masculist Man is a cunt who is obsessed with me, and wants my children

This truly made me LMAO as I read it. Just like ACLAF,this moron is totally off.

Thanks to Veteran for weighing in on FS's blog and no,I'm not Veteran.

Here's what I mean:

Veteran said:

You are a weak yellow belly if ever I saw one. You first try to imitate the likes of Fred X and Duncan Idaho by using profanity, yet at the same time you behave like a chivalrous mangina whipping-boy. Well done, you may have got the respect of a few MRA's (which you don't deserve) through a couple of things you've written where you do slam women. Then you go and ruin it by siding with the enemy and making shitty posts defending women and attacking mras. You write in pink (which is peculiar) and you obviously don't understand issues relating to gender at all. Go away you lilly livered doormat.

14 March 2007 07:11

feminist scum said:

You are a complete idiot aren't you? I don't need to "imitate" anyone. And no, I haven't acted once chivalrous on my blog at all.

I defended women who are on our side, and attacked twats, just like I'm attacking you now. Twat.

Are you so damn retarded you can't see that??

14 March 2007 07:19

Veteran said:

...But he (FS) seems kind of ''weak'' to me all the same, and he's even putting female antifeminists on a higher level on his blog links. I still think him using pink says more about him than anything, and I am uncertain if this man will bring much to the mra movement.

16 March 2007 14:01

Source: https://www2.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=2269605924804131202&postID=1301728181856169462&isPopup=true

Saturday, March 24, 2007

Junior gets corrected

It seems as though Junior is getting questioned in his knowledge of Marc Lepine and somebody had to correct him but after that he fudged his data. Check this out:

ACLAF said:

Marc Lépine was the man who walked into Montreal's École Polytechnique, which is an engineering school affiliated with the Université de Montréal, and shot 28 people, killing 14, wounding 14 then shot and killed himself.

March 19, 2007 3:09 PM

anonymous said:

Marc Lepine didn't kill 14 'people'. He killed fourteen women. Before shooting the women, he sent the men home. Apparently, he was fighting feminism.

March 22, 2007 12:28 PM

ACLAF said:

So, women aren't people? Or are you specifically trying to point out that the people he killed were women in honor of some agenda? Isn't the goal of feminism to point out that women are people too?

He also did not "send the men" home, he shot 4, killing one of them. Himself.

March 22, 2007 2:32 PM

Source: https://www2.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7332840840063644174&postID=4101015994734390404&isPopup=true

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Didn't Junior originally say 14 women were killed and 14 men were injured then after being corrected say that 4 men were wounded and one was killed by Lepine?

Yes as a matter of fact he did. Let's look at his statements again:

Marc Lépine was the man who walked into Montreal's École Polytechnique, which is an engineering school affiliated with the Université de Montréal, and shot 28 people, killing 14, wounding 14 then shot and killed himself.

March 19, 2007 3:09 PM

So, women aren't people? Or are you specifically trying to point out that the people he killed were women in honor of some agenda? Isn't the goal of feminism to point out that women are people too?

He also did not "send the men" home, he shot 4, killing one of them. Himself.

March 22, 2007 2:32 PM


Yes,yes he did. In fact let's look at something else I found interesting,these two statements:

So, women aren't people?.....Isn't the goal of feminism to point out that women are people too?

Is that what you are here for? To further the goals of feminism? It would seem you know a lot about feminism from what you have said and now it seems you are trying to further those goals.
You're the one who,along with FS,sticks up for female MRA's by saying they are "people too" and by your own admission that is the goal of feminism. I knew you were one.

BTW,thanks to anonymous for standing up to this crap.

Monday, March 19, 2007

From FS,with food for thought

FS's comments in italics

I think they're (manginas) even worse than most female feminists. Most female feminists just scream misogyny at everything they disagree with, but manginas are a little more tricky. Instead of answering any arguments they put forward, they either:

- Censor you
- Make an attempt to confuse you, or
- Talk down to you even when you try and be reasonable with them


That sounds a lot like what you and ACLAF are doing. Especially with ACLAF moderating/censoring the comments on his blog and you both shout down your opponents and you both scream "misogyny" so you basically are what you are complaining about. Typical projectionism.

This reminds me,FS's forum colors are basically black,white and pink. The same colors of a women's group that we defeated not too long ago. Hmmmm.

Okay,junior

ACLAF's comments in italics

Respect is earned, not given. Shit head.

The new guard is the future, alienate us, including the girls, at your own peril.

Is that what we really want, another hate movement? Because if that's the way it's going to be, then count me and probably AFN out right here, right now.


It sounds like to me you are saying: "respect us and do as we say or we're out of here". Is that the gist of it? Since you are not good at answering questions put to you without throwing a fit like a kindergartener would I would guess you are demanding respect or else,which would make you a hypocrite.

You seem to have a habit of talking out of your ass,as in:

I shall have to apologize to Fred then! I read him often but I can and do miss personal details about people.
Fred, if you read this, I'm so sorry to have gotten your marital status wrong.

March 6, 2007 8:04 PM

So like a typical bitch you run off at the mouth without having the facts at hand. Yep,just like a feminist. You still are a feminist but you realize they are losing so you come here and since you were ordering them around that you would do the same thing here and get everybody to dance to your tune. Hasn't worked,has it? Nope,not at all.

So let me get this straight,while I was doing what I could for the cause for men you were still choosing which bubble gum to buy with your allowence then you are going to come and tell the veterans how to do this? I don't think so,son. Sit down and shut up,open your ears and eyes and you might learn something.

For the record I don't respect you or your cunt either.

I've posted on Young Buck's and Eternal Bachelor's forum,so they have a rough idea of where I'm coming from. However,Khankrumthebulgar knows me better than they do and their blogs are all listed on your blog front page.

I noticed you are now moderating the posts or just mine? I fucking dare you to post this,if not I will elsewhere. Your choice.

Who's turning on who exactly? I never said that I wouldn't post your little rant, I thought I'd save it for something just like this.

Actually you're the one turning on us,not with just one posting but two and with these two you discourage potential allies and I did tell you that response would be posted,if not on your blog then elsewhere and I meant it too.

Dear Sir,

Perhaps you'd care to explain why you have showed your open support for a mass-murderer? Just what do you hope to accomplish by staging a Marc Lépine style shooting of women?

Marc Lepine faced anti-male affirmative action at his college and basically had his back to wall along with other men. He saw affirmative action give preferences to women just because they had cunts. He saw a Parliment that didn't give a shit,a society that didn't give a shit and had no legal recourse and this was the pre-internet days so he couldn't start a blog to protest the injustice he experienced and chances are the old media was feminist controlled and censored critical information about it so chances are he saw little recourse but to take the action he took to show Parliment and society that it couldn't just shit on men and those men be ignored.

Is that not your profile in the image?

Actually the avatar I use for this blog is Al Pacino from Scarface.

By claiming Marc Lépine's image as your own, do you not express open admiration for his violent criminal actions?

Criminal or someone who's back was to the wall?

And then you expect that we should treat you like a friend, when you clearly want to style yourself as the next Hitler?

And you pattern yourself after Stalin by threatening to silence those who disagree with you so what gives you the right to jump my ass,hypocrite.

You are no friend to the MRM, you are a coward,

More of a friend than you are. Coward? I've done an excellent job in standing up to you and exposing your lying ass and that sir,would make you a LIAR.

and a woman-hater, and you have no place here.

Want to hear something ironic? It's been women who've agreed with me on being suspicious of women. So who's putting you up to your "pro-woman" attitude your wife? Or the other feminists?

I must draw your attention to an article written by well-known columnist, and men's rights advocate, Glenn Sacks. I do not know when the column first appeared, however it is entitled "Confronting Woman-Bashing in the Men's Movement." I have linked the article for your convenience.

I generally agree with Sacks except on this issue. However when he attacks feminists I agree with him. In fact I've told you that when you attack feminists I have no problem with it. Here,let me refresh your memory:

ACLAF,

I've read the responses you and FS have made to the feminasties and it is admirable that you are taken them on as I have done this many times,on that there is no disagreement.

March 17, 2007 12:40 AM

Source: here

It has become relatively common knowledge among the various people who read my blog, that you took issue with my argument in favor of being tolerant towards those women who choose to join the men's movement, and intolerant towards the sexist bigots who would oppose them.

I wonder how many men were put off by those two posts of yours and I'll bet you'll jump on those venting. Wait a minute did you say you have nothing against venting? Yes you did and here it is:

If you wanna vent, that's fine,

March 16, 2007 11:33 PM

But then you team up with FS,who basically played Captain save-a-ho by attacking a man who was venting which led me to ask(and I would like an answer):

Okay,the anonymous poster that FS jumped on was venting. Do you support his right to vent? Or do you support what FS did?

March 17, 2007 12:48 AM

You have accused me of being: an agent provocateur for feminists, a feminist in disguise, a mangina, a communist, a horse's ass, a bitch, a hypocrite, a feminist spy, a "sissyfuck," evil, an asshole, a fucking moron, and an idiot.

Yeah,and it still goes since you have done very little to dissuede me of it.

Given that this is largely based on what you perceive to be chivalry on my part,

Shoe fits,wear it. You've got two posts on your own blog that confirm this.

I must now challenge you to sufficiently address the character of Mr. Sacks and the article in question. I realize that his article is considerably less provocative than mine, but nonetheless, we overlap in our distaste for true misogyny, and true misogynists within the men's movement.

I've answered it.

I don't believe that you have the courage to openly attack Mr. Sacks.

I only disagree with him on this one issue,otherwise I would say continue fighting the good fight.

He has so rightly pointed out that you are nothing more than an ignorant woman basher,

And I've rightfully pointed out you're a pompous ass.

and no friend to men, or to the men's movement.

More of a friend than you are,junior.

He has warned you that such attitudes will likely prove disastrous, but while you attack us, you ignore him.

He's back his shit with action. All I've seen from you is rhetoric.

You have no integrity, you're nothing but misogynist coward, hiding behind an electronic curtain, unwilling to stand up for and say what you really believe in.

If you had been to my message board and read my postings you would know where I stand. Instead you wallow in ignorance and make foolish assumptions. But then again that is your style.

If you have such a problem with men choosing to admire women who join us in this struggle, then you can direct your bile at Glenn Sacks.

I have proven that my beliefs are with merit. Can you do the same with yours?

Your arguments are not only profoundly flawed

How? I've done an excellent job refuting you so they can't be that bad. Tell me something,when you were a (honest) feminist did you tell women to tone down misandry?

but are a disastrous defeatist strategy,

I don't see it that way.

they are also deeply unethical.

How's that? I don't owe women shit. In fact they owe men big time.

The best thing that you can do for the men's movement at this point is to leave and never return.

Tell you what,shit in one hand and wish for my abscense in another and see which one gets filled faster.

Furthermore, your victim-mentality is not only personally repulsive, it smacks of feminist indoctrination.

Well,you would know about feminist indoctrination since you are one,but I'll tackle it:

If a man is a victim of a woman or women is he not to be guaranteed justice and possible compensation? Is he not entitled to equal justice? Is he not entitled to equal protection?

Either prove us wrong, attack Glenn Sacks, or leave, now. We're better off without you.
Since you are far too cowardly to do the former, I expect you'll do the latter.


Well,it looks like you are 0-2 in predicting me.

Sunday, March 18, 2007

ACLAF-again

It seems through it all ACLAF focuses on FEMALE victimization,I offer the following:

ACLAF said:

"Dear Miss Golfman,

I'm so very sorry that the stories of the sacrifices made by Canadian soldiers in Afghanistan had the effect of disturbing your precious Christmas Holidays. I'm truly saddened by your plight. It must have been simply awful for you to realize that some poor child in this country of ours had her cheeks stained with tears, brought on by the knowledge that daddy wasn't going to be coming home."

Source: his board.

Feminist Scum


It wouldn't be right to exclude a photo of Feminist Scum,now would it.

So here he is (he's the one in front).

Saturday, March 17, 2007

What I've said about women

On my board:


I keep hearing about these other mras end up catering to women on orther sites and it pisses me off. The thing is if you're going to be an mra then abandon chivilary or don't become a mra because somewhere on the net perhaps a forum some woman is going to play her games and you're going to start to fall for it and in the process backstab other men that are your allies so think about it.

Now some may say: "Yeah,yeah,heard it before. How about proving it".

To which I say no problem.

I give you The Good,The Bad and The Sue.

Wednesday, March 14, 2007

Junior is at it-again

Junior is harping again on his anti-misogyny trip,this time linking to a Glenn Sacks article denouncing women bashing. For an "anti-feminist?" he sure spends a lot of time denouncing "woman bashing",more so than the feminists do.

I believe the guys in the following article may be misogynistic,for good reason:

http://www.canada.com/topics/news/national/story.html?id=07ee25b1-dd0c-401b-8a05-060bc8e4c1d0&k=22944

http://www.cbc.ca/canada/british-columbia/story/2007/03/13/bc-rights.html

This is happening in their own country yet they don't address it,instead they continue to tell men how to act. Pathetic.

Monday, March 12, 2007

Just what has the old guard accomplished?

One of the them being lobbying Florida to change the false accusation of rape laws from misdemeanors to felonies. I read this in the Liberator a few years ago,sorry no link.

The NFL's Mike Ditka brought up prostate cancer awareness in the NFL.

Masculist lobbying has lead to:

Scientists Discover Way To Block Growth Of Prostate Cancer CellsScientists have discovered for the first time a specific biochemical pathway by which the sex hormone, androgen, increases levels of harmful chemicals called reactive oxygen species (ROS) in the prostate gland that play a role in the development of prostate cancer.

http://masculistman.proboards49.com/index.cgi?board=mensissues&action=display&thread=1163424932


Oct 24, 2006 8:56 pm US/Eastern

Judge Rules 9-Year-Old Will Not Have Circumcision(AP) CHICAGO A judge in a case closely watched by those who oppose circumcision sided Tuesday with a divorced man who did not want his 9-year-old son to undergo the procedure. Circuit Judge Jordan Kaplan said that circumcision is "an extraordinary medical procedure" for a 9-year-old and that the boy can decide for himself when he turns 18.

http://masculistman.proboards49.com/index.cgi?board=mensissues&action=display&thread=1161781109


Tamihere still in favour with votersApr 18, 2005

Source: TVNZ.co.nz

He might have upset most of his parliamentary colleagues, but John Tamihere has struck a chord with voters.A ONE News Colmar Brunton poll shows his claims that men are ignored and political correctness has taken over have widespread support.

http://www.mens-rights.net/forum/index.php/topic,1515.0.html


Male-Bashing at Mother Merrill?By Kevin BurkeSep 8, 2006 1:50 PM

Merrill’s sex-discrimination troubles just won’t go away. But this time it isn’t a woman raising a stink. Blas Catalani, a former sales manager at Merrill Lynch’s San Antonio office, is suing a female ex-broker and her lawyer on grounds that the two women conspired to get him fired.Catalani filed a complaint in a Bexar County, Texas, district court against former Merrill rep Hydie Sumner and her attorney Linda Friedman for allegedly trashing his reputation to upper management in an effort to break his contract so that Sumner could take his job. Catalani is seeking $8 million in damages and forfeited pay. On Aug. 29, Catalani also filed a discrimination complaint against Merrill with the Texas Workforce Commission and the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, alleging that the company dismissed him based on his gender.

http://masculistman.proboards49.com/index.cgi?board=mensissues&action=display&thread=1158065381


Flatley Hopes to Become 'Lord of the Courtroom'The Associated PressFriday, July 28, 2006; 11:20 AM

LOS ANGELES -- Michael Flatley has won a court ruling that allows him to sue a woman who claimed he had raped her.The state Supreme Court ruled Thursday that Flatley's $100 million extortion and defamation lawsuit against Tyna Marie Robertson can proceed to trial.

http://masculistman.proboards49.com/index.cgi?board=mensissues&action=display&thread=1154211533


U.S. Appeals Court Rejects Arousal Test for Sex OffenderBy Tanya Caldwell, Times Staff WriterJune 21, 2006

A periodic test that measures a man's response to erotic images is "Orwellian" because it examines his mind, not just his body, and should not be used because it deprives him of more freedom than necessary, a federal appeals court ruled Tuesday.In order to be released from prison, U.S. District Judge Dean Pregerson had ruled in 2001, Matthew Weber would have to subject himself to tests in which a pressure-sensitive electronic device is placed around the penis and the response to stimulating images is monitored, said his lawyer, Jonathan Libby.

http://masculistman.proboards49.com/index.cgi?board=mensissues&action=display&thread=1150999041


Judge rules SR women's fitness club must open to menBody Central found in violation of state's anti-bias law after Santa Rosa man's complaintBy STEVE HARTTHE PRESS DEMOCRATIn a case that could have repercussions for single-sex fitness clubs, a Sonoma County judge has ordered a Santa Rosa women's health club to open its doors to men.Judge Knoel Owen said Body Central must provide showers and lockers for men and stop advertising itself as a women-only health club.

http://masculistman.proboards49.com/index.cgi?board=mensissues&action=display&thread=1149512438



The New Hampshire Commission on the Status of Men.

http://www.nh.gov/csm/index.html



To name just a few.

Feminist Scum-mangina 2

Feminist scum said:

28 February 2007

Fuck off you twat

Women who "get it"

I just HAD to post this incredible nonsense posted by some Anonymous coward bad mouthing female anti feminists.

these women don't "get it"! what they actually realise is that feminism is about to backfire, and the want to cover their asses before its too late.what we men need to "get" is that these women are not coming into new information and having an awakening. the idea that feminism discriminates and has negative affects is something the have known all along. they are simply feigning ignorance to try to look innocent.ask yourself weather you truly believe these women could go so long through life and not know men were suffering. they new, and couldn't care less!most of these women are simply reading MRA sits and blogs and parroting mindlessly in a vain attempt to appear on our side, but sratch the surface and im sure you see self centered motives.these women should be barred from the movement! not only is it pointless to have a group of self motivated backstabbing harpies in our ranks, it also sets a bad standard for what we expect of women. is all these women have to do given the attrocities feminism has done,to be start a blog and copy past from MRA sites? are we going to demand nothing more? one of our problems as a movement is we haven't come to any agreement as to what is expected in recompence from women. sure we have a list of demands that would see a system made fair. but is all we ask of someone who puts a knife in our back that they take it out? are we all even if the knife is taken out?women need to show their sincerity by paying a fair price before they get to be viewed as partners in any form. and what we need to do is come up with a list of "prices" to pay, so that we can review the lives of these women and have a colective agreement as to what a fair price really is.

Piss off, Anonymous. Female anti feminists have almost nothing to gain from joining us. Femcunts and manginas have all of the power in society, and female anti feminists are going against peer pressure, shaming tactics and refusing to be sheep like the rest of society. You claim they have to prove their selves because they're women. Bullshit. I could easily be a mangina in disguise yet you demand nothing from the likes of me. That right there is unfair AND discrimination. Something you claim to hate about feminism. You also claim that they've known all along how bad feminism is, yet the likes of me are new to the movement, and I didn't know until recently how bad feminism was. So that point is crap too.I get no satisfaction from calling out a fellow anti feminists on bullshit, but this had to be done. But also, at the same time I get the feeling that this guy is actually either a femcunt or mangina posing as one of us to show how "sexist" we are. Either way, your comment was a load of shite regardless of who you are.

Posted by feminist_scum at 04:19 24 comments


Maybe I'm wrong but I've always felt that MRA sites were a safe haven for men to vent how they feel about women in today's society yet they are getting shouted down as though they were posting on a feminist board. Now if anonymous had posted on a feminist board this reaction would be understandable but on an MRA board? Why is this the case on an MRA board?

This brings up more questions: have they ever told women to tone down misandry? Have they ever done this to back up their "anti-sexism anti-hate" attitude or are they just trying to subdue us? Have they ever actually taken on the enemy (our enemy) in this war,whether through debate or other challenges?

I have and I've posted it here. What have feminist scum (fs) and aclaf done beside fuck with us? Those are the questions we should be asking.

Are you?

A Canadian Liberal Against Feminism said...

Hey Rob, I know it's off topic but have you encountered this Masculist Man and Chris Key before? They seem like trolls to me, and are all over that thread we were chatting on yesterday. Are they legit, or are they trolls?

9:33 AM

https://www2.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=32989938&postID=4343162504597097546

I've explained who I am and I have my forum listed in my profile so if someone has doubts about me they can check out my message board. Not only do I hold discussions there I write down my pearls of thought so that others may enjoy them as well. You can go to Chris' board and see where he coming from as well and you will find we've been very truthful about ourselves.

Now that you bring this up I would say that you are an agent provacatuer sent in by the feminists to aggitate things and you've done an excellent job too. I read how Rob Fedder compared feminism to communism (feminism actually has two wings: a left (liberal) one and a right (conservative) one) and when he got to the part of "critical theory" and how that works I thought of you and what you are doing and it struck me because that is exactly what you are doing here,divide and conquer.

It won't work because I won't let you do it.

Since the feminists are taking this tactic it would seem that they are losing and that is indeed joyous news.

We do???

I think one of the most cowshit things I have read in a long time is from the cow herself:

"well it is the same with us women, we are not all spoiled yet, it is up to you, men, to accept us in your cause."

http://feministscum.blogspot.com/2007/02/fuck-off-you-twat.html

This reminds me of what Rich Zubaty said (for the book see my profile) and that was women have a need to spread their memes everywhere and they feel their presence is required everywhere and that everyone will benefit from their abrupt intrusions. That they feel they have to occupy every sphere there is. Zubaty also went on to say that men need a space free from female intrusion or we will go mad. Very true words indeed.

In fact the only other man there at the link above,was an anonymous poster who left the following,which I agreed with and stated so:

"these women don't "get it"! what they actually realise is that feminism is about to
backfire, and the want to cover their asses before its too late.
what we men need to "get" is that these women are not coming into new information and having
an awakening. the idea that feminism discriminates and has negative affects is something the
have known all along. they are simply feigning ignorance to try to look innocent.
ask yourself weather you truly believe these women could go so long through life and not
know men were suffering. they new, and couldn't care less!
most of these women are simply reading MRA sits and blogs and parroting mindlessly in a vain
attempt to appear on our side, but sratch the surface and im sure you see self centered
motives.
these women should be barred from the movement! not only is it pointless to have a group of
self motivated backstabbing harpies in our ranks, it also sets a bad standard for what we
expect of women. is all these women have to do given the attrocities feminism has done,to be
start a blog and copy past from MRA sites? are we going to demand nothing more? one of our
problems as a movement is we haven't come to any agreement as to what is expected in
recompence from women. sure we have a list of demands that would see a system made fair. but
is all we ask of someone who puts a knife in our back that they take it out? are we all even
if the knife is taken out?
women need to show their sincerity by paying a fair price before they get to be viewed as
partners in any form. and what we need to do is come up with a list of "prices" to pay, so
that we can review the lives of these women and have a colective agreement as to what a fair
price really is."

http://feministscum.blogspot.com/2007/02/fuck-off-you-twat.html

Sunday, March 11, 2007

Who are you?

Fair enough. I may seem like a johnny-come-lately to you but let me assure you I have been around the internet promoting men's rights for quite some time now. I used to have a very successful board with Cool Board but they went under. I was on Delphi for awhile,my views were deemed "too extreme" by the Delphi staff so a lot of my handles were deleted (even though the feminasties said worse and were of course,untouched) and I had to make up new ones. I was debating feminasties and I'll be damned if I'm going to let them win. Then I noticed that an employee of Delphi was visiting feminist forums and wrote about why my handles were deleted. I got what basically can be called a "fuck you" email response from them,probably by the cunt visiting these forums. Well,I basically posted their response and this bitch's activities on my Cool Board forum and let Delphi know about it. They must have shitted all over themselves because they canned her ass a week later so I count that as a triumph.

More recently I have another board that has been around for over a year and I moderate on other MRA boards as well.

In fact the last feminist I tangled with (a male one) can be found here: http://www.mens-rights.net/forum/index.php/topic,1001.0.html .

ACLAF and the little missus



Mr. Arrogant and his ego-once again

A Canadian Liberal Against Feminism said:

Lee - Thanks for the vote of support, I really do appreciate it. I honestly could care less if I'm the only one who calls for some degree of tolerance, but a little support goes a long way. Ruth - Well, if he wanted to belong, he could develop manners which were more befitting a human being. It's all really rather childish isn't it? I give it a few weeks. Once he realizes that I'm not actually going to feed his ego by granting him what he desires, and ignore him, he'll probably shut up and go away, which incidentally, is probably what he should have done in the first place. I also know that he's reading this, and posting nearly everything said on his aforementioned forum. I think it might be fun to try to make him guess where I want him to jump next. I'm certainly not going to waste much more time on what is so clearly a child trapped in a man's body.

March 11, 2007 5:37 AM

I'm just supposed to shut up and go away,is that it? I wouldn't be much of an MRA if I did that now would I? I noticed he didn't post my response to a previous post. Hmmm,now he has to engage in censorship to avoid me. It seems that just like every other liberal they believe in free speech-for themselves only and if you notice IT IS WOMEN PRAISING HIM FOR WHAT HE DID. Aren't these the actions of a mangina? I believe we all know the answer is "yes".

Now as far as when I "jump" next is easy: I will "jump" to his board,get the evidence that shows what an utter mangina he truly is and "jump" back here and post it for the world to see. So I don't think he really wants me to "jump",because if I do he won't like it.

I caused it

I also want to add that one of the U.S. government agencies I wrote to,the FCC,to complain about pro-female content and misandry and this was during the Clinton administration so you can imagine the uphill battle I faced. I believe I was the one to intially cause the "angry,white males" backlash that a member of the FCC told congress. It was also during this time that I was a subscriber to the Liberator and that the Clinton adminstration had the FBI monitor our newsletter while leaving rabid feminists who wrote worse alone or worse yet,assisted in promoting their misandric bile.

On a humorous note: I guess the FBI director at the time,Louis Freeh,must have read the Liberator because he became a stay-at-home dad,so I like to think their monitoring move bit them in the ass.

Saturday, March 10, 2007

Are we going on a guilt trip? Nope,not me

A Canadian Liberal Against Feminism said:

Saturday, March 10, 2007

'Tis better to be silent and thought a fool, than to speak and remove all doubt

Looks like I struck a nerve with my last post! A few of you (well, one of you) took some pretty serious offense-Good. That means that I'm on the right track, because as soon as I threatened to silence the radical misogynists of the MRM, (I think that there might only one, but I'll get back to you about that), they came crawling out of the woodwork, spewing hatred and vitriol, left and right, like so much confetti-distracting, but relatively harmless. To that sadly misguided individual, I'd like to say the following.

Well done sir, not only have you succeeded beyond my wildest expectations, of removing all doubt in my mind about your particular level of intellect, but you've justified and proven every single thing that I thought I knew about you. Congratulations sir, you've successfully turned the MRM into what is ultimately nothing more than another hate movement, while demanding respect and legitimacy which not only have you completely failed to earn, but in so openly making yourself a target, have in fact lost any hope of ever gaining either respect or legitimacy, from anyone but a few other similarly misguided folks. They should follow your example sir, at the very least the specter of doubt remains for some of them.

Perhaps you think that you don't want a movement with many people in it, and that's just fine. That being the case, I would urge you to crawl back to your delightful little corner of the web, where you and your lovers-I mean, comrades, can go back to worshiping... uh well, each other, I guess, and never bother any real people again. We promise to keep the harsh light of legitimacy, respectability, and responsibility off of you, and by the looks of things, that won't be too difficult.

To conclude, I will say this. You do not speak for me, or the rest of the MRM bloggers out there, and with the weapons-grade stupidity with which you have shown yourself to possess, I doubt there's any danger of that particular train-wreck of a scenario from ever happening. Rest assured that I, and hopefully others will be watching, and when you feel the need to crawl out of wherever it is that you call home, I will calmly point to this little document, and indicate that you will never be able to regain that which you so casually throw away, the camouflage of ambiguity.

Those who forget their history are doomed to repeat it, and repeat it you will sir, you've more than seen to that.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Masculist Man:Oh,he's going to silence his critics. Oooh,how Orweillian. He still has that feminazi attitude of shutting down those he doesn't like. For your information,sir,history is one of my strong desires in reading so I am well aware of it and I am aware of the mangina you are.

Good Day.

What this is all about

One day on the web I decided to visit a blog I've never been to before,A Canadian Liberal Against Feminism (ACLAF or CLAF). I didn't fing anything objectionable until I scrolled down to the following:

Tuesday, March 6, 2007

In Defense of the Girls

A few of the others have picked up on this sort of thing, and not only is it a serious warning sign, it should be raising alarm bells among MRA's. What I'm refering to is the few true misogynists among the men's movement who are becomming disturbingly louder and are adding a taint of bigotry to our anti-feminist tirade.Gentlemen, we cannot afford to allow true misogynists to take over this movement!I'm not talking about guys like Fred, Captain Z, and Duncan Idaho who eschew women in their personal lives for various, almost always valid reasons. These are not true misogynists in that they while they will not share their personal lives with women, they are still very welcoming of, and encouraged by any woman who takes up our cause. They're welcoming of women, and this is a sign that they are not true misogynists, even though that accusation is thrown at them over and over again.I'm talking about a few people who are turning on those women who have had the courage and honor to stand with us and take up our cause. Fred X made a post a few days back about "Women who 'Get it.'" Very quickly, an anonymous commenter turned up spouting things like this:

these women don't "get it"! what they actualy realise is that feminism is about to backfire, and the want to cover their asses before its too late....ask yourself weather you truly believe these women could go so long through life and not know men were suffering. they new, and couldn't care less!...these women should be barred from the movement! not only is it pointless to have a group of self motivated backstabbing harpies in our ranks"

Gentlemen, we cannot afford to tolerate this sort of thing. Thankfully in this case, Fred, Feminist_scum, clovis and others came on a tore whoever this is a new asshole. This solidarity is a good thing, and we need to stick with that.In the case of two of these women in particular, both A Feminist's Nightmare, and "K" are under the age of 26. A Feminist's Nightmare is my wife, and is only 25 years old. To accuse her of having stood by her whole life and having done nothing to help men is nothing but the most disgusting arrogance, and bigotry. Quite simply, she hasn't had the chance to do anything about feminism yet, her adult life has barely started, and already she's being accused of not doing enough. This is absolutely absurd; she's only 25 years old! Furthermore when I met her, I, me, was the feminist-sympathizer, not her. Should I be drummed out of the movement because I used to have some wrong ideas when I was young and stupid?As for K, I don't know her personally, but she claims to be an art student. This makes her even younger than my wife, in fact I believe that she said she was 18 years old at some point. This makes her even less deserving than A Feminist's Nightmare of these wrongful accusations, because she isn't even done school yet! She should be applauded and welcomed with open arms for having come to her senses so early in life, not accused of "covering her ass!"Apparently the commenter has never heard of Erin Pizzey, who is considered a heroine to MRA's. Erin Pizzey as some of us undoubtably know was the founder of the women's shelter movement, and later railroaded and stabbed in the back by feminists. In her excellent article "How the Women's Movement Taught Women to Hate Men," she discusses how the women's movement was hijacked by radical lesbian feminists who hated men, and wanted a forum to voice their bigotry and hatred. Erin Pizzey's testament should not only encourage us in the achievement of our goals, but it should also serve as a stark warning, that we can easily be hijacked by radical misogynists. We are not immune to this sort of influence, and we cannot afford to turn into a new form of feminism; a reverse-feminism. And that is exactly what would have occurred, and will occur if openly misogynist comments like the one above are allowed to go unanswered or even supported.So, I had hoped that we had learned our lesson flirting with bigots of that sort, and then I saw this:

To those women who have woken up, you are 40 years too late.You have stood silent for too long to earn my respect. Some women only now stand up because the writing is on the wall and they can see a price to be paid for a huge bill going back decades. Women will swing in whatever direction that benefits them the most. They always want to be on the side of the winning team. It appears for some women that the feminist movement has gone from the Profit Side to the Loss Side of the ledger."

and this:

Very good argument against the janet-come-lately women, and the men who feel they should once again come to the rescue of the situation for all( which really means in the end men coming to the aid of women yet again).

Now perhaps I've misunderstood. And perhaps the 40+ generation is well deserving of blame. But I don't think that it's at all appropriate to blame all women for a mess created by a few. Nor is it appropriate, or even commendable to attack our sisters-in-arms by virtue of their sex. This sort of thing smacks of the worst kind of bigotry and hatred, which gentlemen, we cannot afford. Gentlemen, if we allow this sort of thinking to spread, we become no better than the feminists that we so strongly oppose. There will be absolutely nothing to distinguish us from the hatred and bigotry that so strongly permates all feminists. Gentlemen, there is no choice in this matter, our sisters-in-arms must be made to feel welcome here, because they are. So to the people who are against women MRA's, I have exactly two thing to say. First as far as men coming to the aid of women yet again, wake the fuck up, because in case you have some sort of delusion, that's what men do, and have been doing for thousands of years. I agree that thankless feminazis should be left to rot, but I will happily try rescue those where there is some hope remaining. Secondly you men who think that women shouldn't be allowed to be MRA's, please remove your head from your oubliette or it is we who will be throwing you out.Now that I've said it, don't make me say it again, because the next time, I won't be nice about it.
Posted by A Canadian Liberal Against Feminism at Tuesday, March 06, 2007 44 comments Links to this post
Labels: ,

I was thinking what an arrogant little shit this asshole is,I didn't intially know his age but read that he is 25. I did leave the following reply:

Let's debate,shall we?I see a liberal doesn't fall far from the liberal tree. Let me clue you in,it's going to be us "misogynists" that are going to be the fuel that gets this fire going as a lot of guys are going to see you as the same as Promise Keepers,total wussies and sell outs meanwhile they are going to see us as truly opposing feminism and join our ranks. Wake-up.Let me clue you into something else,there are NO FEMALE MRA's. I have yet to meet one who didn't end up fucking up and coming off as a bigger harpie than the most ardent feminist. I've also seen "MRA's?" such as yourself run to the aid of an admitted feminists when they "break a nail" and bow at their feet. THAT IS NOT A TRUE MRA.So I would say that the misogyny is well deserved since it is primarily women who caused it and if it's getting too hot for you I suggest you get out of the kitchen.Yes,there are only two exceptions I can think of: Erin Pizzey like you mentioned and Ester Villiar. Two exceptions does not illegitimitize misogyny.You say we should bow down to women because that is tradition. Well,if I feel I have the right to kill those of a different race than me and have been doing so for years then by your definition it is okay because it is traditional,isn't that right? For the record this is what I'm refering to:"First as far as men coming to the aid of women yet again, wake the fuck up, because in case you have some sort of delusion, that's what men do, and have been doing for thousands of years."You say you are going to kick me out? Let me tell you something,I've been a masculist since '93,when the Bobbitt mutilation went down,I took offense at what happened while others laughed and I decided to official become a masculist after being falsely accused of sexual harassment and losing my job then finding out I had no legal recourse. I wrote my elected officials,journalists such as the late Mike Royko and media moguls such as Sumner Redstone,owner of MTV which at the time was hard core feminist and misandric. I stood up for men when it was an uncool time to do so. Hell,I even wrote to advertisers to get the message across that men are human beings. I campaigned for the cause of men,I put up flyers for the Liberator,which at the time was very well known masculist newspaper and I've made copies with MONEY out of MY OWN POCKET and posted those flyers.How long have you been an MRA? Is it in years or not quite that far? What have you done for the cause?I've been at it for 14 years now,can you match or beat that? I've NEVER been a feminist sympathizer,too bad you can't say the same,huh.I guess I was thinking of you and those like you when I wrote this:I keep hearing about these other mras end up catering to women on orther sites and it pisses me off. The thing is if you're going to be an mra then abandon chivilary or don't become a mra because somewhere on the net perhaps a forum some woman is going to play her games and you're going to start to fall for it and in the process backstab other men that are your allies so think about it.

Source:My Board

March 10, 2007 4:13 AM

and the reply I get back is:

Masculist Man - If you're so fucking high and mighty and good for the MRM, then why have I been unable to find a SINGLE blog which links to a forum which incidentally, appears to have been opened since 2005? "OHhhh.. look at me, I'm sooo special, I've been a masculist since 1993, but haven't contributed a damn thing! I'm soooo good, and you're sooo bad!"Hmm, let's see, it's not THAT hard to get picked up on the blogs, I've only been blogging for about three months, and I"m pretty sure that I can find twenty or so blogs that have linked me. And if you're so good for the MRM, then why are there only two members who actually bother to use it hmmm? I think we've seen enough fembot mangina stupidity from you.

NEXT!

March 10, 2007 7:14 AM

Didn't take anything I had to say into consideration. Typical feminist tactic. Junior is truly delusional if he thinks I'm the mangina he is. Then he has his wife screech in:

Hey masculinist man, you are a fucking fucker asshole.yes you have been fighting for men's cause for t 15 some odd years and us for just a little while???you are a fucking moron. This is like telling a ten or so year old child to do something he doesn't know or understand shit about.or like putting a child to jail for th crimes his/her parents did????Are you a fucking idiot or what???? You know the world goes round, round, round, and things change, change, change. Welcome to the twentyfirst century ! 2007!!! woohooo!!!At least be fucking lucky that we recognized feminazism for what it really is and that as a consequence the MTM/MRA is growing.Go fuck yourself asshole? saying that we are young is ludicrous. you'll soon be dead, we will follow along, but how about the next who will follow us? We are here to change society, for the good of all, not your own fucking good. We are here to do something for the future, so that we do not leave the world to the next generations, in the dirty nasty state WE found it! because of idiots like you! If you're sooo good, and have been fighting for this cause for so long, why aren't things different?????????? Why did we inherit of this crappy world? go fuck yourself! Things are starting to change now!!!! Because finally something is happening, but not because of you! but because of people like all these bloggers, and yeah, you're not linked anywhere, even I, a WOMAN i have been picked up within the first day !!!!So why is it that you are so important??? We are here to work together to make things change. Sometimes we will have disagreements, major ones, minor ones. Real strength is present when people can work things out despite disagreements and work together for the better of a bigger whole!not for your own convenience asshole!And by the way, old does not necessarily equal wisdom.Many times it does, but not always.Old can also equal with insanity. In your case, you definitively aren't wise, believe me, we do respect the old and wise ones. Because they are useful! you are not, you're either senile or stupid. Rob for example is wise guy and I respect him, YOU masculinist shitty head, ARE NOT WISE!!!! and I do not respect you!

March 10, 2007 7:48 AM

Of course,my reply was:

CLAF and AFN,

A ballless mangina and his hairy leg dyke cunt bitch,who probably has the balls in the relationship but she's going to find out I have a bigger set. Just like most liberals you try to shame your opponents and shout them down. AIN'T GOING TO WORK,BITCH. NOT WITH ME ANYWAY. Oh,you have more members,you are so popular (I'd rather have the few MEN posting on my board than the many manginas like you and the femicunts like your bitch). I guess that matters if you still have a high school mentality which obviously you and the "little missus?" (you know,the other guy in your relationship)have and are still in delayed adolescense or perhaps you still too fucking ignorant to learn so instead you come off like the mangina you are,along with this "cunt?" (Only if you turn "her?" over,dude) to try to intimidate us into changing our ways. Go back to the feminists and tell them it didn't work. Tell them Masculist Man exposed you two for the world to see. They know who I am,I'm on their "enemies list" so they have a file on me.You haven't done shit except for open a blog and even on that you reveal what a mangina piece of shit you truly are.You didn't answer one fucking question. Instead you and the bitch start screaming and shouting like children,typical fucking liberals. You say you want to rid the world of "hate" except the "hate" you both project upon others. You show no respect toward anyone else so why should we respect you. Because you tell us to? Fuck you both you pompous asses.Oooh,so you so 21st century. Okay,Mangina Boy,how many MRA forums do you own/moderate? I own one and moderate on Chris' board,among others.You've done nothing but run you mouth here like a little fucking yapping dog that gets kicked so it'll shut up.You don't know how to debate so just shut the fuck up,both of you.

March 10, 2007 7:02 PM

I also told them:

Oh yeah,McMoron I also want to add that I've had other boards in the past but they were usually shut down due to complaints by liberals such as yourselves.

March 10, 2007 7:20 PM

And I found it rather interesting that she should bring up age because I brought that up to another poster (max) that said:

Masculist Man; are there any mras you do respect?I bet you enjoy reading true misogyny that spouts from that vile fred x or eternal bachelor. I dont hate them but they are very vulgar indeed. I cant believe those guys get as many visitors and comments as they do.

March 10, 2007 5:21 AM

Now willing to give credit and blame where they are due I reply:

Max,

EB has the right idea. Why get married when the deck is stacked against you.Are there MRA's I do like? Yes,Rob Fedders and Zed are making a lot of sense but I've seen so-called "MRA's?" such as CLAF before and they arrogantly tell everyone else what to do,even those of us who know what to do. Trust me,CLAF are anything but MRA's. Then he has the nerve to say that unless we bow down to him he and his wife are leaving. To that I say fine,don't let the door hit you on the ass on the way out. If CLAF thinks I'm going to bow down to some 25 year old who is a johnny-come-lately compared to my pioneer spirit then he is sadly mistaken. Out of one side of his mouth he arrogantly tells everyone else how to behave and conduct themselves but once the minute it is turned on him he uses his young age as an excuse. It sounds a lot like "Old enough to lead and critisize yet too young to withstand critisism". (Which,the way I see it,is bitch thinking)Yes he is young,which is even more reason to learn from the non-mangina oldsters such as myself who have been in it for awhile and the long haul.If we are too much for you then I suggest you go to the feminist blogs,they might be more to your liking.

March 10, 2007 5:52 AM

One of my friends stopped by to give me a good reference,he is an MRA in true standing:

While I do not agree with everything that MasculistMan says, I do have a lot of respect for him, as he is trusthworthy and reliable. MasculistMan should be lauded for his work as an MRA, as he is living proof that conviction and abruptness can be used to neutralise the deceitful and hypocritical tactics that the feminists use to subjugate men and boys. If the world had more men who were as strong-willed and as honourable as MasculistMan, then the feminazi's days of lobbying for unethical law acts that legalise the subjugation of men would be over. Therefore, we need as many men like MasculistMan as possible, and we need them in every city on the planet.Another good MRA is a man from the Netherlands called Bert, as he is abrupt, honest and reliable. The most knowledgeable and inspirational MRA I have ever known is DCM, as he uses his wisdom to educate the youth about the impracticality of feminist ideology.These type of men should never be faulted for standing up and defending Men's Rights, as their method of spreading awareness has proven itself to be superior to the "chivalrous" tactics used by softly spoken men. (Speaking of chivalrous men who are softly spoken, a considerable amount of them fit the stereotype of weaklings who imbibe on a cup of tea while they converse with feminists and man-haters; they're also the ones who feel "proud" of the fact they put the toilet seat down after they urinate and wash themselves with scented soap.)Saying that though, I agree with the author's argument that women shouldn't be rejected from the men's movement just because they're female, as it would be illogical -- and detrimental to the movement -- as these women might be morally and intellectual sound enough to help promote Men's Rights. Personally, I feel sorry for the female youth, as they have the arduous task of proving to the world that they are not parasitic cunts like the feminazi's. The sad thing is the second-wave-feminists were able to destroy so many institutions with impunity, and the vast majority of them have gone unpunished for their behaviour.

March 10, 2007 7:42 AM

And he said:

MasculistMan may not have his own blog, but he is still a valuable member of the men's movement. For example, he actually promotes Men's Rights in real life. He has contributed a lot to my board. As a result, he is one of the three Global Moderators, and a valued member of the community.You can see his contributions at my forum by clicking on the following link: http://www.mens-rights.net/forum

Note: You have to join the board in order to view the messages -- this is to prevent feminist spies from trolling the board.

March 10, 2007 7:53 AM

Of course Junior has to chime in with:

Chris Key - Yeah, that's some IMPRESSIVE forum over there. We should all take notice of you and your splendid awesomeness! Wow, I'm so impressed that you have managed to dredge up a whole whopping FOUR active members, and yet strangely enough, you haven't been linked by Duncan, or Fred, or anybody else for that matter. I wonder why that is?Wow, you guys are just too much for lil'ol me, looks like I'll just have to close up shop and go live happily ever after. I'm in such awe over your mangina-movement.

March 10, 2007 8:40 AM

To which my friend puts junior in his place:

For ACLAF,In case you haven't noticed, Duncan Idaho has promoted my site on his blog. If you don't believe me, then see for yourself:

http://eternalbachelor.blogspot.com/2006/01/link.html

Darren Blacksmith holds a link to my site on his CoolTools4Men Blog. http://www.cooltools4men.com/links.htm

Steve Imparl has a link to my site on his blog: http://www.stevesmidlifecrisis.com/index.php

Khankrumthebulgar has a link to my site on his blog: http://themanonthestreet.blogspot.com/
The Man On The Street has a link to my site as well! -- http://themanonthestreet.blogspot.com/

You can find a link to my site at http://www.false-accusers.com/

If you want to see MORE sites that link to my site, then search for "men's rights online" at Google, and you will see for yourself.

March 10, 2007 9:56 AM

Does junior refute this or verify? No,he goes back to the same popularity contest as before:

Really now? First of all, as for Duncan, why hasn't he got you on the front page? And second, he originally linked you in January of 2006, and hasn't appeared to have mentioned you since. Second, if any of those folks have posted on your forum, I can't find them. It looks more to me, like the only people who give enough of a damn to bother talking with you, are Masculist Man, DCM, and you Chris, and some others, most of which haven't even bothered to return since some time in 2006. So why should I listen to you, and not treat you and you ilk like a troll exactly? It looks to me like it's the same four or five guys repeating the same thing over and over again. This blog alone has had a much greater variety of people in just 1 week or so, than you get in an entire month.

March 10, 2007 10:39 AM

And I think this one speaks volumes about his mentality:

Oh you certainly showed me! Wow, I'm just so impressed by you and your five whole members! You and your sausage-fest can hurl all the insults you want, but you certainly don't deserve my respect fuck-tard. Respect is earned, not given. Shit head.

March 10, 2007 7:50 PM

When it comes down to respect,isn't he the one demanding it? It certainly seems so.

"Sausage-fest"? Does this mean "phollocentric" by any chance? Isn't "phallocentric" a feminist buzzword? Yes it is and didn't junior say he is an "ex?" male feminist? Yes he did,perhaps he is not so "ex" as he would appear to want people to believe.

Of course my final reply to him is this:

You say:
"Respect is earned, not given. Shit head. "

But then you say:

"The new guard is the future, alienate us, including the girls, at your own peril.
Is that what we really want, another hate movement? Because if that's the way it's going to be, then count me and probably AFN out right here, right now."

It sounds like to me you are saying: "respect us and do as we say or we're out of here". Is that the gist of it? Since you are not good at answering questions put to you without throwing a fit like a kindergartener I would guess you are DEMANDING respect or else,which would make you a hypocrite.

You seem to have a habit of talking out of your ass,as in:

"I shall have to apologize to Fred then! I read him often but I can and do miss personal details about people.
Fred, if you read this, I'm so sorry to have gotten your marital status wrong. "

March 6, 2007 8:04 PM

So like a typical bitch you run off at the mouth without having the facts at hand. Yep,just like a feminist. You still are a feminist but you realize they are losing so you come here and since you were ordering them around that you would do the same thing here and get everybody to dance to your tune. Hasn't worked,has it? Nope,not at all.

So let me get this straight,while I was doing what I could for the cause for men you were still choosing which bubble gum to buy with your allowence then you are going to come and tell the veterans how to do this? I don't think so,son. Sit down and shut up,open your ears and eyes and you might learn something.

For the record I don't respect you or your cunt either.

I've posted on Young Buck's and Eternal Bachelor's forum,so they have a rough idea of where I'm coming from. However,Khankrumthebulgar knows me better than they do and their blogs are all listed on your blog front page.
I noticed you are now moderating the posts or just mine? I fucking dare you to post this,if not I will elsewhere. Your choice.